AutoGen

FIRST-HAND READS

What people reported, in their own words. Every line links to where it was said.

• “my previous experience with LLM wrappers convinced me to stay away from them (Langchain, Llamaindex, Autogen, others). In some cases they were poorly written, and in other ways the march of progress rendered their tooling irrelevant fairly quickly.”

  NEGATIVE · reliability · Hacker News · 2026-01-17

• “CrewAI & Autogen couldn't give the control most CTOs are demanding”

  NEGATIVE · features · Reddit · 2025-05-15

• “I used to dig into autogen and other agent libraries in the past but everything will just get easier to use”

  NEGATIVE · ease of use · Reddit · 2025-05-13

• “i could use autogen for fast prototyping research but scope could change to deploy in live server where many go through it”

  LUKEWARM · ease of use · Reddit · 2025-04-29

• “unable to use groq with autogen despite following the groq documentation”

  NEGATIVE · integration · Reddit · 2025-04-27

• “Prefer autogen and crew personally (for multi genetic stuff)”

  POSITIVE · features · Reddit · 2025-04-17

• “what has u folded in the last few days both from the two main others of the original paper (now branching off with AG2), and the MS team (autogen-chat et al) has put all notions of stability in question”

  NEGATIVE · reliability · Hacker News · 2024-11-17

• “I've been playing around with Crew-AI / Autogen and Aider / Agent-Zero - Sure, it's not gonna put anyone out of a job just **yet**, but TBH it seems only a turn of the handle or two away before it'll **really** start coming together.”

  LUKEWARM · features · Reddit · 2024-08-21