Make

FIRST-HAND READS

What people reported, in their own words. Every line links to where it was said.

• “a Make.com automation uploading YouTube videos to a website, began uploading dozens of YouTube's latest videos”

  NEGATIVE · reliability · Hacker News · 2025-12-20

• “personally I prefer Make, as they're more robust and their pricing is more friendly, especially for smaller projects”

  POSITIVE · price · Reddit · 2025-05-15

• “I rebuilt everything using Bolt.new for the interface and Make.com for backend automation.”

  MIXED · features · Hacker News · 2025-05-09

• “We ended up using Make.Com to handle several features we initially expected Monday.com to support out of the box”

  POSITIVE · features · Reddit · 2025-05-09

• “Make.com used to drive me bonkers when it took 10+ minutes to create all the nodes in the UI to handle loops, errors, etc.”

  NEGATIVE · ease of use · Hacker News · 2025-05-03

• “Make has made the platform a lot more user-friendly with tools and other features, but more importantly, they have managed to match and keep up with Zapier in terms of app connections”

  MIXED · features · n8n_community · 2025-03-26

• “for me generating images in http://make.com make.com it sends the request to the API it generates and image returns it and then send that object to the next node”

  POSITIVE · performance · n8n_community · 2025-01-08

• “works in postman and in the browser as well as in http://make.com make.com”

  POSITIVE · performance · n8n_community · 2024-12-29

• “the quality is significantly less than what I get if I use the structured data module http://make.com make.com provides for OpenAI”

  POSITIVE · performance · n8n_community · 2024-11-30

• “I used the same endpoint on http://Make.com Make.com and successfully retrieved the expected data”

  POSITIVE · performance · n8n_community · 2024-09-11